Congress of Charlatan Conniving?

CJ P. interviews Noam Chomski on the Obama Legacy.

I might call it the problematics of democracy.
But Not Fully Read Yet.
Early questions relate* to suggested Elizabeth Warren / Gary Johnson debate.
I will be looking for positive alternatives from this analysis, especially in foreign policy and diplomacy.  The opposition must be accounted for, as well as the differences in neo-pragmatism.**
Something about working it here before working it over there?  Or the inverse of the pre-Bush(43)con on policeman and nation builders. 

*(The Warren Wing vis a vis the Libertarian Wing of the parties.)
** a fleeting label[!]

Thought experiment.

On the suggestion that there are different dimensions of a religion or ideology based on the do amicus [!] ...dynamics of political power, akin to my lemony ship it...*

*links and edits 5-23-16
[!] spell check LOL
(do amicus: auto fill)
[and labels]
[This originated from a comment that there are different "levels" of Islam. Well... there are certainly different perspectives on Christianity.  Do they really depend on whether they are in the majority politically?  This might open up an whole new bailiwick.  ( !?! Sanders and Trump "followers" and the rules.) ] 

Separate thought or tangent:  $13.50 Too muddle against the means.

5-28-16
Jennifer Rubin: Raw Story on Clinton Republicans
Michael Bourne: Salon on Bernie as Clinton VP
David Sloan Wilson: Evonomics on Corporate Evolutionism
Anne Gearan: (RSN) Washington Post on Sanders DNC platform (Cornel West)committer persons.

5-30-16
Perspective in Progress [ ? ]  (/)

Tricky Pan Peter

Nun* Dick Tater [?].
The Anti-Matter Fountain [!]

(hint: Pan by Jove ?)
Fries or Checkers?

* Chef Bo yaR D?

Interesting Dig

With the talk that the President is on a "charm offensive" with his recent dinner invite, a look back at George W. Bush found these unrelated googles. 

FORMAT NOTE:  You read so I don't have to?*
I don't recall George W. Bush being especially charming in his first term with a Republican House and a split-Senate let alone hospitable to Clinton administration concerns about terrorism.  Isn't it interesting though that the Bush family had relations though with both the Hinkley and Bin Laden families.  I'm not saying there was a conspiracy, only that it is an interesting dig.  i.e. one find of the google (thanks to Al Gore Rythms)[!]

*There just so happens to be Six Links embedded above, but the interesting dig refers to the unrelated googles. (or R they?)
.

Clog Alert!

Not to Ribble, but regarding two points here:
The tenor of Bane Or. 
Rather than footnote, I will say Ctrl F "anachronism..." and scroll over "speaking of speakers"
Note to Editor(i.e. me): review dating 4mat. Chuck Todd, Today Show (R)

A. Norman Goldman comments on Boner.(I say Bane Or...)
B. The political parsing of wills and divided government, not to joke about punchlines or politicians and lawyers or bitter pills.

Further parse N later ...  [^]

^ not [exactly]
Review Saved in^^ Draft and Tangents.
^^ 12-31-12 [!] ?  w h ?

[C-The Cyle: "Stuck on Repeat"  RE/A+B "Amen Gov" (...) or E-Moat-Iconn?  i.e. "Boehner in a Bind?" /// F B D (S.E. Drift)^^^ or working with hope? and case studies!(patton lee adsurd?)/(Re:N-dell) (M.C.Time**) Not my comity of journalism]*

^^^ live drafting
*[1-4-13 e-N-f  / Re:Turn to C? i.e. inserting links now.(& later*)
** must review re:hope? & *

Un-P.C.(Or Read Meet?)

[reference asterisk *]
[The following is posted on 5-31-12 although continuance of 5-26 material]
Cow Pies: 

QED? * http://lbo-news.com/2012/05/26/bain-actually-loves-dems/

Footnotes:
[1] http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=Simpson+Bowles
[2] http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=Bowles+Simpson
[3] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jared-bernstein/private-equity-firms-what_b_1545342.html

[4] http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/05/badge-of-courage.html
[5] http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/05/tar-buck.html
[6] http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/05/clinton-is-full-of-bs.html
[7] http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=Turd

The History of B.S.

[Herstory and Blog Searches* aside.]
[Originally Drafted May 26, 2012]
There is a joke about what the oldest profession is, but I won’t go there.  It is more or less about procreation. The B. S. I am talking about is the flip-flop of Simpson-Bowles.[1] Yes, I believe that was its name before it hit the road.  It was supposed to be a bi-partisan committee on the debt, but could not come up with any consensus on how it should be addressed, so its full report was submitted more like a Supreme Court decision that was tied. 

Recently it seems that its name was changed, to Bowles-Simpson.[2]  Was there some reason for that?  Could it be to honor the real oldest profession?  And I don’t mean the Barter System.  If this is too nuanced, maybe it is the joke, to be less about creation, more about pro$e.  Either way this is a very economic and political history. 

[More Bio-Product.]***
Speaking of PEG’d...(Private Equity Government)[3] or nailed it, Coffee Table This! [4-7] Now that is creationism.

[Now I realize that some boots may be needed for the above, but I was trying to be economic. But the point is that it is always political and it has not been bi-partisan except on the Democratic side.  Pun on BP aside.** The irony is that it is about walking a plank.  Both want a rising tide, but the Republicans want the people to walk the plank, while politicians take one to the other party boat. Unfortunately this may need deeper boots or Mitt-Flops for the economics, let alone politics.   The B.S. may be in this writing, but it is in the links and balanced solutions as well.]

*literally I will present this without links(see footnotes later)
** bi-partisan (now that is slick)
*** oops:  sorry for anachronisms